In the Name of the King: A Dungeon Siege Tale Reviews

Critic & User Reviews

Metascore ®: 24
Based upon 7 Critic Reviews
What Users Say...
Read Users Reviews Write a Review

Critic Reviews

ReelViews | James Berardinelli

A second-rate regurgitation of "The Lord of the Rings." Everything about it, down to the set and costume design, apes Peter Jackson's epic trilogy. However, while "The Lord of the Rings" was a grand story of scope and power, In the Name of the King feels small in more ways than one.

Read the full review
50
Los Angeles Times | Sam Adams

Its convictionless competence is merely dull, denying the pleasures of an outright howler without providing much else.

Read the full review
30
Boston Globe | Wesley Morris

This is the sort of movie where men stand blankly over dead loved ones, then start digging. Masculine stoicism or emotional botox? You decide.

Read the full review
25
The Onion (A.V. Club) | Scott Tobias

Cultists will be happy to discover that In The Name Of The King bears all the so-bad-it's-good hallmarks of a classic Boll production.

Read the full review
25
The New York Times | Laura Kern

An awkward ?Lord of the Rings? knockoff, it features both elaborate battles and bumbling humor, though it?s never quite clear when you should be laughing.

Read the full review
20
Variety | Joe Leydon

A plodding patchwork of derivative fantasy-adventure, medieval production design, risible dialogue, unimpressive CGI trickery and haphazardly edited action sequences.

Read the full review
10
The Hollywood Reporter | Frank Scheck

It's completely undone by its terrible screenplay, inept direction, oppressive musical score and muddy visual palette.

Read the full review
10

User Reviews

These boards contain member reviews of Movies. Use the Notify links to report improper post. Read AOL Anywhere Rules of User Conduct for more. AOL members: For our full suite of interactive Message Boards, Chats, Polls, and member stories, go to keyword: Movie Talk.

Results 1 - 10 of 32
l ui s 7 9 9 | 04/22/2008 12:16 AM Notify

Worst Movie Ever!!

"This movie sucks balls!! if you want to waste two hours of your life, by all means watch it. terrible movie!!"

stopherwayne | 04/17/2008 02:07 AM Notify

Watch more movies, Jackasses.

"I really enjoyed ever second of the film, Although it was like watching Lord of the Rings on a smaller scale. It was great acting(even though i think ray liotta's acting gets worse with his age) and Matthew Lillard was terriable(and i love the man, he is a great actor). As far as the accents Jason Stathom really talks like that you idiots. But all together i really enjoyed it. I think everbodie but one on here needs to take there thumbs out there butts and watch a movie for the movie, not to compare it to others. AMATURES rOCK ON SHANNON.And a foot note to JXGirl, Jason Stathom, Ray liotta, and Matthew Lillard have all come out with movies the past 2 years."

esk8728 | 02/02/2008 09:00 AM Notify

sucks

"this movie was horrible and a waste of money, it looks like it was put together by a 5 year old. Random music plays which are very annoying and horrible acting, this was just a waste of money"

shannonmcmanus | 01/26/2008 04:19 PM Notify

You Are All Crazy!!!

"This Movie Rocked!! It was the best piece of celluliod that I have ever had the pleasure of witnessing. Top notch acting, great set pieces and a wonderful score that brought tears to my eyes at least three times. I highly recomend this movie to anyone who fits into at least two of the three categories, blind, deaf or dead."

jxgirl366 | 01/21/2008 01:49 PM Notify

Someone should sue them!

"Everything was a rip off of Lord of the Rings from the people in the trees to the orc like creatures and the battle in the rain from the hill top. Also very chessy ending last stand fight as well. What was with the levitation and all the books. Dumb. It suited the half-baked actors that they got for the movie that you haven't seen in years. Thank God someone else paid for my ticket."

miniv alto | 01/20/2008 10:31 PM Notify

One of the worst movies

"This movie was awful, me and my friends started looking at each other and laughing at the movie at parts that were so corny. We walked out 45 minutes in a were dissapointed. The story line went from one thing to the next so fast that it did not make sense."

belzipy | 01/20/2008 03:53 AM Notify

God Awful

"Horrid movie by a director known for making just bad films. Who keeps giving this many money to throw away?"

jpcann | 01/19/2008 08:00 PM Notify

GOD AWLFUL

"This movie was so bad that my friends and I started laughing at some of the most serious moments in the film. The plot was predictable and all could think about when Bert Reynolds spoke was an old Smokey and the Bandit Parts I and II ! Ray Liotta looked like a mobster reprising his Mob role. Save your money and give it to Obama instead because Hilliary is pure awlful fiction as well."

mariasicily | 01/17/2008 04:22 PM Notify

Terrible!

"This was a terrible, cheesy movie! I wish I would have read the reviews before hand! Terrible story line, terrible acting, only two characters bothered with accents, everyone else sounded like they were from Ohio. Claire Forlani had such promise as an actress, oh girl, where did you go wrong??? This movie is the death knell for the careers of everyone who acted in this sad tale. Never mind straight to video, I wouldn't even stock a library shelf with this one."

kelmer1988 | 01/16/2008 10:32 PM Notify

THE TRAILER!

"Awesome Trailer. But movie was not good. Boring. fell asleep."

Results 1 - 10 of 32

Write a Review

Post your rating and review! Sign in with your CompuServe, Netscape or AOL screen name to post a review. It's easy and free!
Log in Now!

These boards contain member reviews of Movies. Use the Notify links to report improper post. Read AOL Anywhere Rules of User Conduct for more. AOL members: For our full suite of interactive Message Boards, Chats, Polls, and member stories, go to keyword: Movie Talk.