The Lord of the Rings: The Two Towers Reviews

Critic & User Reviews

What Users Say...
Read Users Reviews Write a Review

What Common Sense Media Says...

Family Rating: Pause | Only for kids 12 + More Family Rating Details

Critic Reviews

Washington Post | Desson Thomson

One fabulous Middle-earth show.

Read the full review
100
Boston Globe | Ty Burr

The miracle is that 'The Lord of the Rings: The Two Towers is better: tighter, smarter, funnier.

Read the full review
100
ReelViews | James Berardinelli

Like its predecessor, The Two Towers is a great motion picture, and not to be missed by anyone who appreciates fantasy adventure.

Read the full review
100
The Onion (A.V. Club) | Keith Phipps

What makes Towers so staggering is the way it brings the full scope of Jackson's adaptation into focus. Without missing a beat in three hours, the film shifts from epic to lyrical and back.

Read the full review
100
Washington Post | Stephen Hunter

Gripping, whole and nourishing. Certainly of the fantasy film series currently in American theaters -– I include "Harry Potter and the Secret Toity" and "Star Trek: Halitosis" -– The Lord of the Rings: The Two Towers is the best, and not by just a little.

Read the full review
100
The New York Times | Elvis Mitchell

Never has a film so strongly been a product of a director's respect for its source. Mr. Jackson uses all his talents in the service of that reverence, creating a rare perfect mating of filmmaker and material.

Read the full review
90
Variety | Todd McCarthy

Has a sharper narrative focus and a livelier sense of forward movement than did the more episodic "Fellowship."

Read the full review
90
USA Today | Claudia Puig

Epic battles, spectacular effects and multiple story lines make The Two Towers a most excellent middle chapter in The Lord of the Rings film trilogy.

Read the full review
88
Rolling Stone | Peter Travers

Spectacular in every sense of the word, even if you don' t know an Orc from a Uruk-Hai.

Read the full review
75
San Francisco Chronicle | Mick LaSalle

An outstanding effort that maintains the integrity and purpose that distinguished "The Fellowship of the Ring."

Read the full review
75
Entertainment Weekly | Owen Gleiberman

What it comes down to is superbly staged battle scenes and moral alliances forged in earnest yet purged of the wit and dynamic, bristly ego that define true on-screen personality.

Read the full review
75
Chicago Sun-Times | Roger Ebert

A rousing adventure, a skillful marriage of special effects and computer animation, and it contains sequences of breathtaking beauty. It also gives us, in a character named the Gollum, one of the most engaging and convincing CGI creatures I've seen.

Read the full review
75
Slate | David Edelstein

A glorious, visceral mess -- The film is, by most criteria, an ungainly piece of storytelling. Yet it sweeps you up and hurtles you along like water from an exploded dike.

Read the full review
70
Los Angeles Times | Manohla Dargis

If the second film never reaches the highs of the first -- we have met the players before and there are no new worlds of wonder -- it nonetheless invests moviegoing with a sense of adventure.

Read the full review
70

User Reviews

These boards contain member reviews of Movies. Use the Notify links to report improper post. Read AOL Anywhere Rules of User Conduct for more. AOL members: For our full suite of interactive Message Boards, Chats, Polls, and member stories, go to keyword: Movie Talk.

Results 1 - 10 of 27
kathjenkins727 | 03/10/2007 12:00 AM Notify

WORST MOVIE EVER MADE

"THIS MOVIE SUCKED! THERE WAS NO ACTION WHAT SO EVER AND THE BATTLE SCENES SUCKED! THIS MOVIE REALLY IS THE WORST MOVIE EVER MADE! IT CAME OUT ON MY ANNIVERSARY AND I SAW IT FREE! I SHOULD HAVE USED IT ON A DIFFERENT MOVIE! THIS MOVIE IS STUPID!"

honeckde40 | 01/30/2007 12:00 AM Notify

nice

"loved it thougt it builds well to the third"

billyjoe6000 | 12/20/2006 12:00 AM Notify

REVIEW LORD

"A GREAT SEQUEL, BUT NOT AS GOOD AS THE FIRST, THE THIRD IS THE BETTER OF THE TWO. GOOD SPECIAL EFFECTS, J.R.R TOLKIEN WOULD BE PROUD."

culliepepper | 12/15/2006 12:00 AM Notify

Awsome

"THis was the best, anf Viggo Mortenson and Orlando Blume were as hot as ever. this is a must see movie."

abieciara | 03/31/2006 12:00 AM Notify

Peter Jackson's Done It Again

"I love LOTR ive read it 14 times and the movies are an excellent adaptation of Tolkien's masterpiece. THUMBS UP!!!"

clippersgm | 12/16/2005 12:00 AM Notify

2nd best movie ever..... next to the 3rd

"this movie was astonishing. The mix between battles and emotional scenes was great. Another thing is how for instance Frodo and Sam don't know whats happening to the others which leads to amazing decisions. I am a huge Tolkien, so this adds to my collection."

bakers772 | 06/10/2005 01:00 AM Notify

Worth Sequel

"I was blown away by this movie, it delivered more than I expected or hoped for, just as good as the first in my opinion, should not be missed, anyone who doesn't like this movie must not really like movies too much."

pierat100 | 03/10/2005 12:00 AM Notify

awesome

"awesome"

mscrown3 | 03/05/2005 12:00 AM Notify

htis sucks

"thsis movie is the worst movie in the whole wide world"

sbstarprincess | 03/02/2005 12:00 AM Notify

the two evil

"A war of middle earth is here. Surman and his fourse against rohan legolas aragorn and gimli. Arwen has to chose death or life. Will aragorn be crowned king."

Results 1 - 10 of 27

Write a Review

Post your rating and review! Sign in with your CompuServe, Netscape or AOL screen name to post a review. It's easy and free!
Log in Now!

These boards contain member reviews of Movies. Use the Notify links to report improper post. Read AOL Anywhere Rules of User Conduct for more. AOL members: For our full suite of interactive Message Boards, Chats, Polls, and member stories, go to keyword: Movie Talk.